咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Chronic Diseases of Childhood ... 收藏

Chronic Diseases of Childhood and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A Systematic Review

Chronic Diseases of Childhood and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A Systematic Review

作     者:Daniela Koeller Rodrigues Vieira Carla Trevisan M. Ribeiro Roseane de Lima Ribeiro Lara Carolina Januário Cabral Daniela Koeller Rodrigues Vieira;Carla Trevisan M. Ribeiro;Roseane de Lima Ribeiro;Lara Carolina Januário Cabral

作者机构:Center for Assistive Technology and Health Products National Institute for Women Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IFF-Fiocruz) Rio de Janeiro Brazil 

出 版 物:《Health》 (健康(英文))

年 卷 期:2022年第14卷第7期

页      面:751-765页

学科分类:1004[医学-公共卫生与预防医学(可授医学、理学学位)] 100404[医学-儿少卫生与妇幼保健学] 10[医学] 

主  题:Chronic Diseases International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health Child Adolescent Disabled Children 

摘      要:The increase in chronic diseases in childhood highlights the need for a biopsychosocial approach to deal with the complexity of these health conditions. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) results from the need to implement new explanatory evaluative and therapeutic models. Thus, the present systematic review aims to identify published studies on the use of the ICF in chronic childhood diseases. As a secondary objective, to map the themes that have already been studied in the area to support the discussion on the expansion of the use of this classification in health services. The systematic review followed the PRISMA protocol, and the model was the PICO acronym, where Population was children and adolescents with chronic diseases, Intervention/Exposure was evaluation based on ICF concepts, Comparator was any tool, instrument, or intervention, and outcome was direct or indirect use of the ICF. We selected eight articles, five of which used the ICF as a conceptual tool and three as a classification system, divided into the following themes: quality of life, evaluation of patients (without using coding) and mapping the inclusion of the activity’s results and participation in clinical trials. Thus, use of the ICF in clinical practice is still incipient, although it has been recommended in guidelines. Further studies are necessary to expand the number of contributions by the ICF and to develop the necessary approaches for understanding the classification’s use.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分