咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Fault prediction of combine ha... 收藏

Fault prediction of combine harvesters based on stacked denoising autoencoders

作     者:Zhaomei Qiu Gaoxiang Shi Bo Zhao Xin Jin Liming Zhou Tengfei Ma 

作者机构:College of Agricultural Equipment EngineeringHenan University of Science and TechnologyLuoyang 471003HenanChina China Academy of Agricultural Mechanization ScienceBeijing 100083China 

出 版 物:《International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering》 (国际农业与生物工程学报(英文))

年 卷 期:2022年第15卷第2期

页      面:189-196页

核心收录:

学科分类:0828[工学-农业工程] 08[工学] 0812[工学-计算机科学与技术(可授工学、理学学位)] 

基  金:The work was sponsored by the Intelligent Manufacturing Comprehensive Standardization Project(No.2018GXZ1101011) the National Key Research and Development Program of China Sub-project(No.2016YFD0701802) the Natural Science Foundation of Henan(No.202300410124) 

主  题:fault prediction combine harvester stacked denoising autoencoders support vector machines 

摘      要:Accurate fault prediction is essential to ensure the safety and reliability of combine harvester *** this study,a combine harvester fault prediction method based on a combination of stacked denoising autoencoders(SDAE)and multi-classification support vector machines(SVM)is proposed to predict combine harvester faults by extracting operational features of key combine *** general,SDAE contains autoencoders and uses a deep network architecture to learn complex non-linear input-output relationships in a hierarchical *** features are fed into the SDAE network,deep-level features of the input parameters are extracted by SDAE,and an SVM classifier is then added to its top layer to achieve combine harvester fault *** experimental results show that the method can achieve accurate and efficient combine harvester fault *** particular,the experiments used Gaussian noise with a distribution center of 0.05 to corrupt the test data samples obtained by random sampling of the whole population,and the results showed that the prediction accuracy of the method was 95.31%,which has better robustness and generalization ability compared to SVM(77.03%),BP(74.61%),and SAE(90.86%).

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分