Systematic nursing interventions in gastric cancer:A randomized controlled study

作     者：Fang He Rui-Xian He 

作者机构：Department of Pancreatic and Gastric SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijing 100021China 

出 版 物：《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 (世界临床病例杂志)

年 卷 期：2022年第10卷第6期

页      面：1843-1851页

核心收录：

学科分类：1011[医学-护理学（可授医学、理学学位）] 10[医学] 

主　　题：Nursing intervention Self-efficacy Self-care ability Cancer-related fatigue Quality of life 

摘      要：BACKGROUND Scientific and effective nursing methods can effectively mitigate negative emotions in *** studies have shown that systematic nursing interventions are beneficial in enhancing the self-efficacy and self-care abilities of patients and improving their physical and mental state,thereby alleviating their fatigue and improving their quality of *** To explore the effects of systematic nursing intervention on cancer-related fatigue,self-efficacy,self-nursing ability,and quality of life in gastric cancer(GC)patients during the perioperative *** In this study,sample size was based on the multivariable *** sample size was 10 times the acceptable variable,with an additional 20% added to account for an expected loss of patients in follow-up for a final sample size of 168 *** nursing measures were used in the control group,while the systematic nursing intervention Adopted Cancer Fatigue Scale(CFS),General Self-Efficacy Scale-Schwarzer(GSES),Self-Care Agency Scale(ESCA),and simple health scale(SF-36)were used in the observation *** questionnaires were administered on admission and *** At admission,there was no statistically significant difference in the scores on each scale between the *** discharge,the CFS and GSES scores in the observation group were 21.56±2.24 and 51.16±11.71,while those in the control group were 29.61±3.48 and 41.58±8.54,respectively,with statistically significant *** ESCA score in the observation and control groups was 112.09±11.72 and 97.87±9.26,***,the scores in all dimensions(self-concept,selfresponsibility,health knowledge level,and self-care skills)in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,with statistically significant *** SF-36 score in the observation and control groups was 75.51±3.63 and 63.24±3.41,respectively,with statistically significant *** scores in all dimensions(mental heal