咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Is there a standardized practi... 收藏

Is there a standardized practice for the development of international ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease treatment guidelines?

目前的溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病治疗指南是否有一个规范的制定流程?

作     者:Alexander Goldowsky Rohan Sen Gila Hoffman Joseph D Feuerstein 

作者机构:Department of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonMAUSA Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonMAUSA 

出 版 物:《Gastroenterology Report》 (胃肠病学报道(英文))

年 卷 期:2021年第9卷第5期

页      面:408-417,I0001,I0002页

核心收录:

学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100201[医学-内科学(含:心血管病、血液病、呼吸系病、消化系病、内分泌与代谢病、肾病、风湿病、传染病)] 10[医学] 

主  题:Crohn’s disease ulcerative colitis inflammatory bowel disease guidelines conflicts of interest 

摘      要:Background Guidelines are published by international gastroenterology societies regarding the management of ulcerative colitis(UC)and Crohn’s disease(CD)to help clinicians to provide high-quality patient *** examined the guidelines for the quality and strength of evidence used to develop the recommendations,methods for grading evidence,differences in disease-specific recommendations,conflicts of interest,and plans for guideline *** A systematic search was performed on PubMed using“ulcerative colitis,“Crohn’s disease,and“guidelinesin April *** gastroenterology society websites were searched for UC-and CD-specific *** from 12 societies were examined by two ***-squared tests were used for comparing evidence-level grades,strength of recommendations,and reported conflicts of ***-regression modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between the number of authors and the number of recommendations in a given *** Of 28 guidelines reviewed,25(89%)used a total of three different systems to grade the level of evidence and 2(7%)used an unknown ***(11%)reviewed guidelines did not provide a conflict-of-interest statement,while three(11%)provided a timeline for guideline *** 1,265 total statements examined,246(19%)reported no grade of evidence quality or explicitly stated that the recommendation was based on“expert opinion.One hundred and thirty-five(22%)UC recommendations were noted to be“weak/conditionaland 95(16%)did not have a recommendation *** hundred and forty-two(37%)CD recommendations were noted to be“weak/conditionaland 151(23%)did not have a recommendation *** The majority of UC and CD guidelines are based on a low/very low quality of evidence and are further weakened due to the lack of homogeneity in specific aspects of management recommendations as well as conflicts of interest.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分