Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma:a systematic review and meta-analysis
作者机构:Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryFirst Affiliated HospitalSchool of MedicineZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ TransplantationMinistry of Public HealthHangzhouChina The Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious DiseasesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
出 版 物:《Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition》 (肝胆外科与营养(英文))
年 卷 期:2021年第10卷第5期
页 面:623-630,I0008页
核心收录:
学科分类:1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学]
主 题:Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) radiofrequency ablation(RFA) meta-analysis
摘 要:Background:This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and toxicity between small hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)and those treated with radiofrequency ablation(RFA).Methods:We searched databases for relevant clinical *** primary outcomes of interest were overall survival(OS)at 1 and 2 years,freedom from local progression(FFLP)rate at 2 years,and ***:Five cohorts from 5 retrospective studies and 4,814 patients with HCC were *** OS at 2 years was significantly lower for SBRT than for RFA[odds ratio(OR):0.63;95%confidence interval(CI):0.51-0.79;P0.0001],but the pooled FFLP rate at 2 years was higher for SBRT than for RFA(OR:1.66;95%CI:1.05-2.61;P=0.03).In addition,there was no significant difference in the local and liver toxicities of the two *** contradictory conclusion between the OS and FFLP outcome may be attributed to the difference in radiological dose and location,but there were no uniform criteria to illustrate the radiological dose and location in the included ***:SBRT had a higher local control ratio but poorer prognosis than RFA in patients with small *** local toxicity was comparable in both *** trials should be designed with uniform standards for SBRT and RFA treatments.