Conventional *** pseudo-dynamic seismic analyses in the shallow strip footing bearing capacity problem
Conventional vs. modified pseudo-dynamic seismic analyses in the shallow strip footing bearing capacity problem作者机构:Department of Civil EngineeringFaculty of EngineeringUniversity of GuilanP.O.3756RashtGuilanIran Rocscience Inc.54 Saint Patrick St.Toronto M5T 1V1OntarioCanada
出 版 物:《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 (地震工程与工程振动(英文刊))
年 卷 期:2021年第20卷第4期
页 面:993-1006页
核心收录:
学科分类:08[工学] 0818[工学-地质资源与地质工程] 080104[工学-工程力学] 0815[工学-水利工程] 0813[工学-建筑学] 0802[工学-机械工程] 0814[工学-土木工程] 0801[工学-力学(可授工学、理学学位)]
主 题:bearing capacity modified pseudo-dynamic method conventional pseudo-dynamic method spectral analysis
摘 要:The conventional pseudo-dynamic(CPD)and modified pseudo-dynamic(MPD)methods are invoked to obtain the seismic bearing capacity of strip foundations using the limit equilibrium method,with a two-wedge failure mechanism.A spectral version of the conventional pseudo-dynamic method(SPD)is also invoked by considering the ground motion amplification factor,to be a function of the non-dimensional frequencyλ/B and soil *** analyses show that bearing capacity results obtained by the MPD and SPD methods are generally *** experience the same general reduction in bearing capacity with the increase ofλ/B,with successive ups and downs corresponding to soil′s natural *** 5λ/B10,SPD and MPD results fluctuated between falling above and below CPD ***λ/B2.5,SPD and MPD results were consistent with attenuation of the shear wave,while for 10λ/B,amplification was *** obtained by the CPD method monotonically decrease,due to the fact that CPD fails to inherently consider site effects and damping,and instead and relies on a single factor to consider the ground motion amplification.