咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >Waste Management Systems among... 收藏

Waste Management Systems among Smallholder Farmers in Masaka and Lyantonde Districts, Central Uganda

Waste Management Systems among Smallholder Farmers in Masaka and Lyantonde Districts, Central Uganda

作     者:Kamoga Gerald Ssekyewa Charles Kamoga Gerald;Ssekyewa Charles

作者机构:Faculty of Agriculture Uganda Martyrs University Kampala Uganda St. Lawrence University Kampala Uganda 

出 版 物:《Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment》 (农业化学和环境(英文))

年 卷 期:2021年第10卷第3期

页      面:314-326页

学科分类:083002[工学-环境工程] 0830[工学-环境科学与工程(可授工学、理学、农学学位)] 08[工学] 

主  题:Farm System Farm Waste Smallholder Farmer Practice Waste Management 

摘      要:With diversity in farming systems, crop residues, animal wastes and management practices are often not well managed, and most of it is left on the soil surface. This practice is common, especially among smallholder farmers (SHFs). There is no updated record of commonly used waste management practices. Our study focused on smallholder farmers in two farming systems in Masaka and Lyantonde Districts respectively, and with the objective to determine smallholder waste management practices in relation to farm waste components. Using a sample survey, quantitative data were collected from 120 SHFs representing 10.1% of the total SHF population in the Masaka while 120 SHFs provided data and represented 17.4% of the total SHF population in Lyantonde. Our result revealed that for animal waste, Goat slurry 20.4%, dominated the rest in Lyantonde, while in Masaka Pig slurry 23.6%, was dominant. For crop waste in Lyantonde, Bean trashes 12.9%, dominated, while in Masaka Banana leaves and peelings 11.1%, were dominant. In Lyantonde, common waste management practices were: Surface deposition 41.2%, Burning 18.4% Composting 17.3%, Burying 9.4%, Removal 10.9% and Recycling 2.8%. In Masaka, common practices were: Surface deposition 40.9%, Burning 18.6% Composting 13.2%, Burrying 12.3%, Removal 6.2% and Recycling 8.8%. Factors affecting choice of waste management practices by SHFs were: Age, purpose of waste product, season, quantity of the wastes, waste management policy awareness, farmer’s commitment and economic status of the farmer. Greenhouse gas emission for identified waste management practices across the two Districts shall be determined in our next study.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点

用户名:未登录
我的评分