咨询与建议

看过本文的还看了

相关文献

该作者的其他文献

文献详情 >What Do Bell-Tests Prove? A De... 收藏

What Do Bell-Tests Prove? A Detailed Critique of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Including Counterexamples

What Do Bell-Tests Prove? A Detailed Critique of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Including Counterexamples

作     者:Karl Hess Karl Hess

作者机构:Center for Advanced Study University of Illinois Urbana Illinois USA 

出 版 物:《Journal of Modern Physics》 (现代物理(英文))

年 卷 期:2021年第12卷第9期

页      面:1219-1236页

学科分类:07[理学] 070201[理学-理论物理] 0702[理学-物理学] 

主  题:Bell Theorem Clauser-Horne-Shimomy-Holt Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen 

摘      要:Many future directions of scientific endeavors depend on quantum theory and the precise interpretation and significance of the entanglement of quantum-particles. This interpretation depends in turn on the physical meaning of so called Bell-tests that are mostly performed using entangled photons and randomly switched polarizers to measure their polarization at distant locations. This paper presents a detailed critique of the well known theory of Bell tests given by Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH). It is demonstrated that several important steps of the CHSH derivations contain serious inaccuracies of the underlying physics and probability theory and even a calculus error. As a consequence, the Bell-CHSH theory cannot be used to demonstrate extreme and opposite interpretations of entanglement such as super-luminal influences or alternatively super-determinism that cast aspersions on Einstein’s concepts of locality and separability.

读者评论 与其他读者分享你的观点