Eye tracking and child sexual offenders:a systematic review
作者机构:Unit of Forensic PsychiatryUniversity center of Legal MedicineGeneva University hospitalsGenevaswitzerland
出 版 物:《Forensic Sciences Research》 (法庭科学研究(英文))
年 卷 期:2021年第6卷第2期
页 面:133-140页
核心收录:
学科分类:1001[医学-基础医学(可授医学、理学学位)] 08[工学] 0838[工学-公安技术] 100105[医学-法医学] 10[医学]
主 题:Forensic sciences forensic psychiatry eye tracking paedophiles sexual offenders systematic review
摘 要:Eye tracking is used in sexology to identify attractiveness and sexual desire *** systematic review summarizes results of works that have used eye tracking to analyse paedophilic interest in order to investigate its potential as a useful forensic *** studies met the inclusion *** of them concerned a large study project and used approximatively the same sample of paedophiles(inpatients),forensic patients(without a sexual interest in children)and healthy controls to make comparisons between the three *** study added 11 self-declared paedophiles(outpatients)for a comparison between inpatient paedophiles,outpatient paedophiles and controls(healthy and forensic inpatients).One study compared a group of child sexual offenders with *** studies used static pictures of male and female subjects at different pubertal *** studies divided every picture into a different area of *** variables used are fixation latency(early attention)and relative fixation time,(later attention).Each study identified significant differences between the paedophile group versus other groups:shorter fixation latency on child pictures,longer fixation time on child pictures and number of fixation most important on child *** scores(age preference index and attentional control index)showed hight and/or moderate sensitivity and *** the results suggest the eye tracking can discriminate between paedophile interest and non-paedophile interest,there are too few studies on this specific topic and further research is needed with larger and different sample,carried out by different research *** these findings were confirmed,it remains unclear as to their impact in a forensic context when presented openly in Court.