Clinical Research on Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

作     者：Baolin Yuan Tao Zhang Jianqi Luo Liang Zhang Suqun Chen Lina Yang Yong Wu Yuying Ma 

作者机构：Department of Radiation Oncology the 2ndHospital of Ningxia Medical Collage Yinchuan750001 Ningxia Hui Autonomous RegionChina. 

出 版 物：《Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology》 (中国肿瘤临床（英文版）)

年 卷 期：2008年第5卷第4期

页      面：263-267页

核心收录：

学科分类：1002[医学-临床医学] 100214[医学-肿瘤学] 10[医学] 

基　　金：supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region China(No.NZ0680) 

主　　题：non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy threedimensional conformal radiotherapy conventional radiation therapy. 

摘      要：OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and toxic effect of the 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy （3DCRT） for non- small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. METHODS Fifty-two patients with the Stage-I and IV NSCLC were treated with 3DCRT. Cross analysis of the clinical data was conducted in the comparison between the 52 cases with 3DCRT and the other 50 cases with the conventional radiation therapy （CRT）. In the 3DCRT group, only the primary tumor and positive lymph-node draining area were included in the clinical target area, setting 4 to 6 coplanar or non-coplanar irradiation fields, with 2 Gy or 3 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction a day and 5 fractions per week. The total dose ranged from a test dose （DT） of 66 Gy to 72 Gy. In the CRT group, the field area contained the primary tumor plus the homolateral hilum of the lung, the mediastinum superior or hol-mediastinum, and opposed anteroposterior irradiation. When the dosage reached DT 36-40 Gy, an oblique portal administered radiation was conducted in order to avoid injuring the spinal cord. The DT was 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction a day, 5 fractions per week, with a total dose of 60 Gy to 70 Gy. RESULTS The therapeutic effect （CR ＋ PR） was 90.4% in the 3DCRT group, and was 72% in the CRT group. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups, P 〈 0.01. There was a clinical symptom improvement attained by 96.5% and 86.4% respectively in the two groups, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups, P 〈 0.01. The 6-month, 1 and 2-year overall survival rates were 92.3%, 75.0% and 42.3% in the 3DCRT group, and 76%, 60% and 30% in the CRT group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the 6-month overall survival rate between the groups, P 〈 0.05. There was no obvious significant difference in the 1 and 2-year overall survival rates between the two groups, P 〉 0.05. The toxic reaction was 12.5% and 23.7% respectively in the 3DCRT and CRT groups. Acute radioactiv