Public health preparedness and responses to the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic in South Asia:a situation and policy analysis
作者机构：Centre of Social Medicine and Community HealthSchool of Social Sciences(Building-II)Jawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew Mehrauli RoadNew Delhi 110067India Department of Global HealthSchool of Public HealthPeking University38 Xueyuan RoadHaidian DistrictBeijing 100191China Institute for Global HealthPeking University38 Xueyuan RoadHaidian DistrictBeijing 100191China
出 版 物：《Global Health Journal》 (全球健康杂志（英文）)
年 卷 期：2020年第4卷第4期
页 面：121-132页
学科分类：070801[理学-固体地球物理学] 07[理学] 0708[理学-地球物理学]
基 金：supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.72042014).
主 题：Coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 Pandemic Intervention strategy Epidemiological management Public health South Asia
摘 要：Like rest of the world,the South Asian region is facing enormous challenges with the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic.The socio-economic context of the eight South Asian countries is averse to any longterm lockdown program,but the region still observed stringent lockdown close to two months.This paper analyzed major measures in public health preparedness and responses in those countries in the pandemic.The research was based on a situation analysis to discuss appropriate plan for epidemic preparedness,strategies for prevention and control measures,and adequate response management mechanism.Based on the data from March 21 to June 26,2020,it appeared lockdown program along with other control measures were not as effective to arrest the exponential growth of fortnightly COVID-19 cases in Afghanistan,Bangladesh,India,Nepal and Pakistan.However,Bhutan,Maldives and Sri Lanka have been successfully limiting the spread of the disease.The in-depth analysis of prevention and control measures espoused densely populated context of South Asia needs community-led intervention strategy,such as case containment,in order to reverse the growing trend,and adopt the policy of mitigation instead of suppression to formulate COVID-19 action plan.On the other hand,mechanism for response management encompassed a four-tier approach of governance to weave community-led local bodies with state,national and international governance actors for enhancing the countries’emergency operation system.It is concluded resource-crunch countries in South Asia are unable to cope with the disproportionate demand of capital and skilled health care workforce at the time of the pandemic.Hence,response management needs an approach of governance maximization instead of resource maximization.The epidemiologic management of population coupled with suitable public health prevention and control measures may be a more appropriate strategy to strike a balance between economy and population health during the time of pandemic.
维普期刊数据库